Conceptual assisted workflow with human review 01Instruction02Proposal03Review04InspectHUMAN-CONTROLLED APPLICATION
Conceptual illustration · not a product image or measured result

The human review loop

  1. 01

    Ask

    The engineer describes a design task and its constraints.

  2. 02

    Propose

    An assistant prepares a candidate change or action.

  3. 03

    Review & apply

    A person inspects the proposal and controls its application.

  4. 04

    Run & inspect

    Tools execute the selected work; the engineer reviews results and limitations.

Engineering judgment stays visible

An assistant can help express a task and prepare actions, but a plausible proposal is not proof of a correct design. The engineer remains responsible for assumptions, setup, result interpretation and deciding whether further checks are required.

Before execution

Check the geometry, parameters and intended action.

After execution

Inspect results and compare against a suitable reference.

Local tools and external assistance

Solvers and design files stay on your machine. The language model is your choice: a local model keeps the conversation on the machine as well, while a cloud model receives the text of the conversation and the design context it needs. We do not claim that every workflow is local by default.

What to inspect in a demonstration

Ask us for a concrete task, the proposed action, the point where a person steps in, a solver result and a failure or limitation. We also show the list of tools the assistant can call.

Request a demo
Continue exploringDesign & simulationNeural field researchExamples & validationServices